Ratings and rankings

Ratings and rankings of financial institutions, compiled and published by the portal Allinvestments.ru, differ significantly from other sources. The main issue is specialization. On our portal focuses on the factors, which are important for depositors and investors, rather than, for example, borrowers and credit card holders.

Assessment of banks, investment companies and other participants in the money market and the capital market is billed on three pillars: reliability, advantageous offers and service cost, as well as the quality of service.

Mathematical model of assigning points for different categories and criteria not covered portal and analysts do not comment in order, to exclude the possibility of manipulation.

With a specific weighting in the summative evaluation fee is involved and the visitors of the portal.

Rating banks, top 5 banks

[wpr_landing cat=’banks’ img nr=’5′ ]

[The whole rating…]

Rating of the Russian brokers, top 5

[wpr_landing cat=’rubrokers’ img nr=’5′ ]

[The whole rating…]

Rating of asset management companies

[wpr_landing cat=’fundmanagers’ img nr=’5′ ]

[The whole rating…]

Rating Forex brokers

[wpr_landing cat=’forexbrokers’ img nr=’5′ ]

[The whole rating…]

Rating foreign brokers

[wpr_landing cat=’foreignbrokers’ img nr=’5′ ]

[The whole rating…]

Top 10 all financial institutions

The combined rating of all financial institutions, and banks, and professional participants of the securities market.

[wpr_landing cat=’professional_institutes’ img nr=’10’ ]

Ratings and rankings, questions and answers

Rejtnigi and ratings are a staple of investment Portal Allinvestments.ru, so they assign us to ask more questions. Try to answer the most frequent of them.

What is the difference between your rating from that, that assign the rating agencies, such as S&(P), Moody ’ s, Fitch and other?

First of all, international and Russian ratings agencies assign exclusively to credit ratings. And we appreciate not only the reliability, but then, how customers benefit from a product company, as well as the quality of service.

In spite of the fact, that we do not comment on our assessment, can lift a veil of secrecy: of course, We are placing reliability assessments, included in our total, rely including the opinion of our esteemed colleagues from rating agencies.

Some banks are present in multiple categories, whether it is?

The point is that, that we did not organise the competition between financial institutions, and help choose the best one for our visitors. Therefore, if a brand is present in multiple categories, then so be it.

Why conventional banks are not the most reliable in your ranking at the top?

First of all, because we appreciate not only the reliability, but the Organization products. In the category “Rating banks” financial institution cannot hold top position, offering low rates. It should be understood, that one of the criteria for reliability – It's not only the volume of assets or capital, a deposit insurance system's willingness to fulfil its obligations.

What is the impact on the rejtnig international sanctions?

They clearly reduce the. The point is that, that, in the case of correspondent accounts lock one or another amount in fact unavailable for financial institution. While it is still reflected in the Russian accounting. But this does not mean, that the company or Bank can it immediately in the event of urgent need.

Say what's more, When a particular political scenario, second-tier banks, not associated with the State, may be more reliable, than the first. You can argue about, is it good or bad, but from the point of view of the investor and depositor – It's a fact.

What is the difference between ratings from rankings?

In the simplest explanation of rating – This score in points of the quality of something. But the ranking is constructed differently – organizations are sorted by a specific indicator. International agencies assign exactly ratings. (A), for example, banks, using assets or capital – This ranking.

In the header of the section we had both terms simply because in the future we plan to publish, and then, and then.